SIR,
I might have supported the pinch point 'trial' by Monmouthshire County Council (MCC), had more thought been apparent about the wider consequences for Monmouth.
The detailed plans, displayed for weeks in an empty shop window, showed that large metal signs were to be erected at every entrance to the town.
This was basically saying that only town centre traffic should proceed, and that all other traffic should 'expect delays' and by definition would be better to avoid the town altogether.
This was not just heavy good vehicles, this was a message to the general public.
Towns like Monmouth survive as living entities according to the health of their retail businesses.
Some years ago, a one-way system was introduced to Ross-on-Wye, and the main street pedestrianised.
The town has never recovered.
Businesses closed down and visitors and locals alike took avoiding action.
David Cummings and his Chamber of Commerce have fought hard to keep Monmouth 'alive' in terms of trade and visitors, despite it seems to me the best efforts of MCC, and arguably at times, our own town council.
A joined-up plan to improve the town especially for the disabled and pedestrians would certainly be supported and welcomed by the majority of people.
If there is some grander idea in the making, then why tinker with that particular pinch point, since there are many other places in town where wheelchairs and prams have difficulty?
Large amounts of money were probably spent on planning the pinch point scheme, evidenced by at least eight people from a private survey firm, in town on two days, counting traffic.
'Trials' have a habit of becoming permanent.
At a time when money is so short, and our rates so high – and about to go up yet again no doubt – I question whether this is the time to spend our money this way.
Diana Falkiner
(Monmouth)